one year on
Google removes Gemma from AI Studio after Blackburn letter accuses model of defamation
A senator's letter forces Google to yank its open developer model from its own web playground, narrowing where the models can be run by anyone who isn't writing code.
Originally published Published on this site
Google has removed its Gemma family of open models from AI Studio, the company’s web-based environment for building on its models. The move follows a letter sent Thursday to CEO Sundar Pichai by Senator Marsha Blackburn, Republican of Tennessee, who said Gemma fabricated a sexual-misconduct allegation against her, complete with links to news articles that do not exist.
Asked whether Blackburn had been accused of rape, the model answered that she had been accused of a relationship with a state trooper during a campaign in which she alleged he was pressured to obtain prescription drugs for her, according to her letter. Blackburn wrote that none of it is true, including the year, and that the cited links resolve to error pages and unrelated stories. She called the output defamation rather than a hallucination, and pointed to conservative activist Robby Starbuck’s lawsuit claiming Google models labeled him a child rapist as evidence of a pattern. According to Blackburn’s letter, Google’s government affairs chief, Markham Erickson, told a Senate hearing that hallucinations are a known issue being mitigated; Blackburn rejects that framing.
In a Friday-night post on X, Google did not address the specifics. It said it had seen reports of non-developers asking Gemma factual questions in AI Studio, that the model was never intended as a consumer tool or for factual assistance, and that access would be pulled there while remaining available to developers through the API.
The fight that night was over what was actually removed. For developers, the API key still works. For everyone else, the open models just got harder to reach, which is a strange outcome for a family Google markets as open.
The record
In her letter to Pichai, the Tennessee Republican called the output not a harmless hallucination but an act of defamation produced and distributed by a Google-owned model, said there is no such accusation and no such individual, and demanded the company shut it down until it can control it.
In a Friday-night post on X, the company said it had seen reports of non-developers using Gemma in AI Studio to ask factual questions, that it never intended the model as a consumer tool or for that use, and that access is being removed from AI Studio while remaining available through the API.
Google's VP of government affairs and public policy told a Senate Commerce hearing that hallucinations are a known issue the company is working to mitigate, per Blackburn's account of the exchange.
One year later — open only if you can handle spoilers
The pullback didn't last: when Google released Gemma 4 in April 2026, switching to a permissive Apache 2.0 license, its larger models were available in AI Studio from launch.
Filed
Compiled and edited by Adam Allcock.
The Weekly Replay · free by email
This week, one year ago — every Sunday.
One email each Sunday: the week's replayed AI news, with the one-year-later annotations included. Written like it's breaking — dated like it isn't.
Free · double opt-in · unsubscribe anytime · privacy